George Osbornes brother guilty of dishonest behaviour

Published: 11:59AM GMT twenty-two February 2010

Dr Adam Osborne Photo: CENTRAL NEWS

A General Medical Council (GMC) row found that Dr Adam Osborne, 33, was at error over equivocating the name of a cocaine-addicted crony on a medication he handed to sanatorium staff.

He after performed the preferred anti-psychotic drug at a in isolation pharmacy utilizing an deficient form. But members of the row pronounced charges of dubious and prejudiced poise in propinquity to the second medication were not proved.

Muslim dentist refused to provide lady unless she wore headscarf Tories contingency conflict the urge to applaud George Osbornes alloy hermit faces GMC overprescription irregularities explain Younger hermit of George Osborne is dangling from operative as a alloy Education spending to be cut by �100m notwithstanding Gordon Browns oath

Dr Osborne could be struck off the healing register if the GMC row finds the doctor"s fitness to rehearse impaired, a move that will lead to sanctions.

Dr Osborne had progressing certified that he met a lady - referred to in the box as Miss B - in a car play ground outward the Wythenshawe Hospital on May twelve 2008.

The crony was pang from hallucinations as a side-effect of heroin use, call the alloy to try to acquire the drug lorazepam and haloperidol.

But rather than take Miss B in to the hospital, he went on his own and falsified her name.

Ruling on the matter of contribution in the case, Alyson Leslie, chair of the disciplinary panel, told Dr Osborne: "Attempting to acquire haloperidol and lorazepam for Miss B by essay an NHS medication in a fake name and presenting that at a sanatorium pharmacy was misleading.

"The row is additionally confident that attempting to acquire haloperidol and lorazepam in those resources was dishonest."

The sanatorium denied Dr Osborne"s ask for the drug as the name since for the studious did not compare any one in the records.

Following the refusal, he gathering to a circuitously pharmacy where he wrote out a in isolation medication for the medication, utilizing an deficient form that longed for out Miss B"s name and address.

The row ruled that it was not valid that this constituted dubious and prejudiced behaviour.

The row will listen to from an additional declare prior to determining if Dr Osborne"s fitness to rehearse is marred due to misconduct.